Ny Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney

A New York State casino referendum for voters has one attorney questioning the ballot’s wording november

In November, ny voters are scheduled to vote for a referendum that could enable several casino that is new become built through the state. But if one Brooklyn attorney is successful, that referendum will be halted due to language within the ballot question he claims violates state law.

Referendum Language Questioned

The language in the referendum features a wide range of ‘legislative purposes’ that paint the proposal in an unmistakably positive light. For example, the question mentions ‘promoting job growth, increasing aid to schools and permitting neighborhood governments to lower property taxes.’ That language was authorized by hawaii Board of Elections in July.

But now, lawyer Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York law. Based on case filed into the New York State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the State Constitution’s prohibition on the use of public money in the aid of ‘private undertakings.’

‘The Constitution is pretty clear that you can’t use public cash to sway or influence a vote,’ Snyder said.

Snyder isn’t the only one who has brought up problems with the language in the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also view it as one-sided, and groups that are religious also noted the language used when telling parishioners to consider social ills that could come along with the advertised great things about casino expansion. Ny Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney Okumaya devam edin